Leeds United’s return to Elland Road at Companies House is a signal of intent from 49ers Enterprises, which understands must be followed by the cash many fans trade in.
Bookmark Comments Beren Cross SPORT Opinion
By Angus Kinnear defined Elland Road’s ownership transition this week as a modest movement in corporate structure. The paperwork was completed in March, but Leeds United made an announcement yesterday when the stadium’s business accounts were published.
Elland Road Limited remains in control of the ground, but it is currently owned by Leeds United Football Club Limited, the club’s holding company. For the past six months, since Andrea Radrizzani sold everything, it has been directly controlled by 49ers Enterprises.
Given that the 49ers group controls the club, it still retains control over Elland Road and its destiny, but it has been pulled in from the cold, so to speak. The American group owns the club, and the club has reclaimed ownership of its home.Radrizzani raised suspicions and fears when he considered using Elland Road as security in his Sampdoria takeover, putting supporters on edge. How secure was the stadium during such an event?
Leeds United Supporters’ Trust spearheaded the effort to relist the ground as an Asset of Community Value with Leeds City Council. That position establishes checks and balances on any significant event concerning the stadium’s future, particularly its ownership.
With it in place, and confirmation that 49ers controlled 100% of the shares in the ground since September, concerns were alleviated. There is always a need for trust between fans and the proprietors of their team.
In corporate terms, a majority stakeholder has vast power to impose its will. An uncomfortable decision may elicit the loudest protest it has ever seen from a devoted fan base, but if it does not care about that relationship, it will do whatever it wants and face the consequences.
Supporters have the ability to protest and make their voices heard when it comes to their club, their second home, but they must hope and trust that United’s ownership will do the right thing. So, if the 49ers group must be trusted to govern the club, the same holds true for stadium ownership.
There has been no outcry for documentation to return Elland Road to the club’s management since the takeover. If the 49ers group controls the ground, it does so directly or indirectly through United’s holding company.
However, Paraag Marathe et al. did explore such a reform. As Kinnear stated in his brief statement, it is a wide indication of intent from the 49ers organization.
It wants Leeds and Elland Road to be connected so that supporters know how important these ties are.
There is another month until the season begins and another seven weeks until the transfer window closes, so decisions on the summer must be made in that framework, although it has been difficult for fans thus far. When signings begin to arrive and positive results begin to flow, emotions will improve, but 13 departures against two additions raises some concerns.
Joe Rodon’s return is excellent business, but Archie Gray’s exit, no matter how profitable, will always sting. Red Bull’s investment has also been met with skepticism, despite Marathe’s public efforts to ease those concerns.
In a summer following Wembley loss, all of this makes it difficult for the 49ers to gain favor. Supporters want new faces signed as soon as possible because that is the currency they trade in, and seasoned administrators like Marathe and Kinnear must understand that it will be a difficult battle until they do.
Bringing Elland Road home gives the supporters some credit, a nice footnote in the larger story of their ownership, which will be judged in the coming years.
Leave a Reply